That statement will be invalid or it will become a lie after 100 years.
So that statement has no permanent value.
If God says about himself I exist,that statement is valid for all times.
So the word exist can be used only in relation with God. Otherwise it is invalid.
Charlatans without mentioning the name of God, use the term exist to deceive others and try to sell their hidden agenda.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete"If God says about himself I exist,that statement is valid for all times"
ReplyDeleteIf enki says about himself I exist,that statement is valid for all times
If Saint Gemarman says about himself I exist,that statement is valid for all times
If athechele says about himself I exist,that statement is valid for all times
If Krishna says about himself I exist,that statement is valid for all times
If table says about himself I exist,that statement is valid for all times
Howdy?
First define exist moron, then we will see whether we can apply 'exist' with your rubbish term god.
ReplyDeleteYou are using another meaning of exist, 'LIVE' here. Though you say exist, it's actually 'I live'. Another trick or just olain ignorance?
No statement has permanent value fool, meanings change, new words come, some words becomes obsolete. When you use 'exist' it is in PRESENT TENSE. Nothing cannot say and people do hallucinate and say they have no end, so don't repeat nonsense.
By the way you still haven't answered the question, is god a thing or nothing.
Are you afraid charlatan, to specify and let the audience know what you mean when you say 'exist'?
ReplyDeleteWhen you say 'god exist', does it mean god is shit?
If I write the statement "I run " and keep it for 100 minutes,what will be the value of that statement after 100 minutes.
ReplyDeleteThat statement will be invalid or it will become a lie after 100 minutes.
So that statement has no permanent value.
If God says about himself I run,that statement is valid for all times.
So the word run can be used only in relation with God. Otherwise it is invalid.
See, only people of low intelligence can come up with such nonsense. We intelligent people first decide what'run' is, then see who or what can run. You on the other hand, always say only 's' runs and run should be used only with 's', without ever telling the audience what you mean by the term. Instead of making run "independent" you made it an adjective.
And you are again attempting your skullduggery, what you are saying is that only if someone is ETERNAL, they can be said to EXIST and you decided ONLY your god (incidentally is nothing) is eternal.
ReplyDeleteYour god, nothing, is eternal but doesn't exist.